top of page
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • TikTok

AIVERGENT

Responsible AI Statement

At AIVERGENT, we believe that creativity and artificial intelligence can combine to unlock new modes of expression, collaboration and influence while upholding respect for human dignity, creative authorship, cultural diversity and transparent responsibility. Our AI creative workflows are designed, developed and deployed under a clear framework of ethical, artistic, technical and governance standards.

 

We commit to pushing the frontier of creative AI and doing so in a way that is trustworthy, inclusive and aligned with the values of the creative industries.

​

This Responsible AI Framework describes what “responsible AI” means for us, how we operationalise it, and what it means for our clients, our partners and our creative ecosystem.

What is Responsible AI (in our context)

Responsible AI means leveraging AI tools, models and processes so that the creative output (campaigns, collections, personas, visual assets, digital experiences) is generated, managed and delivered in a way that:

  • Respects authorship, originality, and cultural integrity (especially critical in fashion, art, image generation)

  • Avoids unintended harms (biased or stereotyped representations, mis-use of imagery, mis-attribution of creative labour)

  • Maintains transparency and trust with clients, partners, creators and audiences

  • Upholds privacy, data-security and rights of individuals whose images, likenesses or personal data may be involved

  • Promotes inclusivity, diversity and fairness in representation, creative voice and opportunity

  • Ensures accountability and human oversight across the creative AI lifecycle: concept, generation, review, deployment, post-use.

We therefore treat “responsible AI” as not just a check-box but a creative-industry-specific commitment: one which merges the best of tech ethics (from Microsoft/Google/Meta) with the imperatives of art, fashion, storytelling and brand integrity.

​

Core Principles (adapted & contextualised)

Drawing on Microsoft’s six principles (fairness; reliability & safety; privacy & security; inclusiveness; transparency; accountability) Microsoft+2Microsoft Learn+2, Google’s AI Principles blog.google+2Google for Developers+2 and Meta’s Responsible AI guide AI Meta+1, we adapt and rename them for creative work:

  1. Creative Fairness & Inclusivity

    • We ensure our AI-driven creative outputs avoid unfair bias, harmful stereotyping or exclusion of under-represented creative voices or identity groups.

    • We purposefully design for diverse representation (gender, ethnicity, body types, aesthetic styles) and avoid reinforcing narrow creative norms.

  2. Reliability, Safety & Quality of Creative Output

    • Our generative models, workflows and assets are tested and reviewed to ensure they perform reliably, produce safe (non-harmful, non-misleading) and brand-appropriate outcomes.

    • Unexpected creative ‘glitches’ or unintended mis-representations (for instance of identities, cultural heritage, or brand values) are proactively mitigated.

  3. Transparency of Creative Process & Data Use

    • We communicate clearly to clients, collaborators and audiences how AI is used in the creative process (what was AI-generated vs human-crafted; what data/training assets used; how the model was guided).

    • Where relevant, we provide mechanisms for review, appeal or correction of creative assets.

  4. Respect for Privacy, Intellectual Property & Rights of Creators

    • We ensure any personal or creative data (photos, models’ likenesses, brand assets) used in model training or generation is used with proper rights, consent, and attribution where needed.

    • We safeguard all client data, creative briefs and AI-assets under robust data security and privacy practices.

  5. Accountability & Human Oversight in the Creative Lifecycle

    • Human creative directors, brand stewards and ethics leads serve as the final decision-makers in the creative workflow—not the AI alone.

    • We have clear governance: who is responsible for each stage (concept, generation, refinement, deployment) and how clients can engage/approve.

    • We track, document and audit creative AI projects: what model was used, what prompt/email brief, what human adjustments were made.

  6. Continuous Learning, Innovation & Ethical Evolution

    • Given the rapid pace of AI + creative innovation (especially in fashion, media, influencers), we commit to reviewing our framework, tools and practices regularly—learning from new models, new creative paradigms, feedback, regulation.

    • We aim to raise the creative bar, not just adopt AI for shortcutting but to extend human creative potential responsibly.

​

 Implementation & Governance (How we do it)

A. Creative AI Project Lifecycle

For each project, from concept to live campaign/asset, we follow these stages with corresponding checks:

  1. Concept & Briefing

    • Clarify creative objective, brand values, target audience.

    • Identify any sensitive representations (e.g., culture, identity, body image) or rights issues (models, influencers, data).

    • Define how AI will be used (generation of look, image manipulation, digital persona creation, etc).

    • Define human-in-the-loop oversight roles (creative director, legal/rights review, ethics check).

  2. Data & Model Preparation

    • Verify that training/asset data (if applicable) adhere to rights/consent.

    • Ensure dataset is appropriately diverse for the creative objective.

    • Select or design prompt/AI-model parameters with consideration of representational fairness, creative relevance and brand integrity.

  3. Generation & Review

    • Generate creative output (images, personas, campaigns) by AI + human guidance.

    • Conduct internal review: creative quality, brand alignment, potential harms (mis-representation, unintended bias, offensive or misleading visuals).

    • Incorporate human refinement, retouching, brand/legal stakeholder review.

  4. Deployment & Audience Engagement

    • Clearly disclose when AI-generated assets are used (especially where authenticity or human authorship might be assumed).

    • Provide attribution or explanation if relevant (e.g., “created by AIVERGENT AI + human creative team”).

    • Monitor public reaction and feedback post-launch; have channel for concerns or rights issues.

  5. Post-Use Audit & Learning

    • Document the project: model used, prompt, human adjustments, review outcomes, any issues found.

    • Analyse outcomes: Did the AI perform as expected? Did any issues (creative bias, misunderstanding, brand mis-match) arise? How to improve next time.

    • Update internal best-practices, prompt-templates, governance checklist accordingly.

B. Governance Structure

  • Ethics + Rights Lead: A senior person (internal or consultant) who oversees adherence to this framework for each creative project.

  • Creative AI Committee: A cross-functional group (creative director, technologist/AI lead, legal/rights counsel) that meets at project-start to check the save-guards.

  • Client Transparency & Contractual Consent: Client engagements will include clauses about AI usage, rights, data usage, representation, client approval loops.

  • Audit & Reporting: Maintain internal log of creative AI projects, any issues/harm-incidents, mitigation steps, lessons learned.

  • Continuous Improvement: At least annually (or when major new model/tech is adopted), review the framework, update in line with new regulations, tools, or creative risks.

C. Rights, Consent & Data Management

  • Secure proper models’ likeness releases, especially if using AI to generate or manipulate real-model faces, bodies or personas.

  • Ensure any third-party datasets or training data used for creative AI generation are cleared for commercial/creative use and appropriately licensed.

  • On collection of personal data (influencers, models, clients), comply with applicable privacy laws (e.g., GDPR for EU/RO context).

  • Protect clients’ proprietary brand assets, briefs, influencer personas from misuse via strong data-security and governance.

D. Risk-Mapping for Creative Use Cases

Creative‐AI has specific risks – e.g.:

  • Generation of images that mis-represent or appropriate cultural heritage, identity or creative styles without consent.

  • Generation of deep-fakes or misleading influencer personas.

  • Attribution issues: off-brand style derivatives, unintended resemblance to real persons, violation of creative rights.

  • Brand reputational risk: AI output that doesn’t align with brand values, triggers backlash (diversity, body-image, cultural sensitivity).

We therefore include for each project a Creative AI Risk Assessment covering: likelihood of unintended bias, rights exposure, brand mis-alignment, mis-use of AI asset post-deployment, feedback/appeal mechanism.

​

​

​

 Our Commitments to Clients & Stakeholders

  • We commit to full transparency: we will disclose when and how AI is used in the creative deliverable.

  • We commit to human-in-the-loop oversight: an experienced creative director or rights professional will always review and approve final assets.

  • We commit to inclusive creative representation: we will proactively seek diverse models, creative voices and ensure representation aligns with best-practice fairness standards.

  • We commit to rights integrity: we will ensure all models, datasets, creative assets used or generated are licensed, cleared and rights-compliant.

  • We commit to prompt-review & feedback: clients will have an opportunity at project stages to review AI-generated iterations, raise concerns, request revisions.

  • We commit to continuous improvement: we will publish (internally) lessons learned, update our processes, adopt new tools and standards so that our creative-AI practice remains cutting-edge and trustworthy.

​

How You (Client / Influencer / Partner) Can Engage

  • Ask for a project-specific creative AI brief that states where AI will be used, what data/assets will be used, who will oversee the output.

  • Review the AI-asset workflows (e.g., “AI generated first pass, then human retouching and brand alignment”) and understand the approval steps.

  • Provide clear brand values, diversity/representation guidelines, cultural sensitivity notes early in the brief.

  • Maintain open feedback loop: if you spot mis-representation, likeness issues or rights concerns, raise them before final deployment.

  • Consider disclosure: if the campaign uses AI-generated imagery or influencer persona, decide how you wish to communicate that to the audience (e.g., “AI-created look by…”, “digital persona created by…”).

  • Understand and respect rights/consent for any models, assets or datasets used in the project.

Periodic Review & Evolution

Given how fast the generative-AI & creative tech field is moving, we commit to:

  • Annual review of this Responsible AI Framework (or sooner if major new model/tech is adopted).

  • Update of our internal creative AI policy in line with global regulatory developments (e.g., EU AI Act, industry best practices) and new research.

  • Training of our team (creative, technical, legal) on emerging issues: e.g., copyright of AI-generated art, deep-fake dangers, cultural appropriation risk, model transparency.

  • Publishing, where appropriate, a “Responsible AI Creative Report” summarising lessons-learned, metrics of diversity/inclusion in our creative outputs, and feedback from clients/stakeholders.

 Why this matters for AIVERGENT’s Creative Industry Focus

  • In fashion, media and influencer ecosystems, the creative output is not just functional—it carries aesthetic, cultural, identity and brand resonance. Unchecked AI could replicate harmful stereotypes, mis-represent identity, misuse imagery, or erode brand trust.

  • By adopting a rigorous Responsible AI Framework, AIVERGENT positions itself not only as technically advanced but as ethically and artistically premium—essential for luxury / high-fashion clients, premium influencers, and brand-sensitive campaigns.

  • It enables brand-clients to feel confident in our workflow: that AI is an augmentation, not an uncontrolled wildcard; that rights, diversity and brand values are embedded.

  • It helps us anticipate regulatory and public-trust risks: as generative AI becomes mainstream in marketing, fashion, influencer economy, stakeholders (brands, audiences, regulators) will demand transparency, fairness and rights-respecting practices.

  • It contributes to building your “moat” (as you’re already creating): your differentiation is not just “we use AI” but “we use AI responsibly, artistically, with premium governance, for luxury/creative brands”. That touches on your strategic vision for AIVERGENT.

bottom of page